Response to “The Machine Ends” by E.M. Forster

Written in 1909, “The Machine Stops” is about a futuristic society in which humanity lives underground and is dependent entirely upon the Machine, which has taken over the entire maintenance and care of all human needs. It describes how people have given up control of their own freedom to exert free will, in exchange for complete obedience to the Machine.

It was a peculiar but interesting story, particularly being written in 1909. According to Wikipedia, US events in 1909 included Taft succeeds Roosevelt as president, Pearl Harbor is founded, and the Manhattan Bridge is opened, while in Europe construction begins on the Titanic and the oil company that eventually became BP was founded. Forster seems to be writing from a perspective of relatively significant industrial and social change so the story is likely meant to be a reflection and a warning on unrestrained acceptance of technological innovation, and a belief that machines alone are the key to the future of the human race.

One of the phrases that reinforced this idea was on page 18, “No one confessed the machine was out of hand”. That could be taken literally, as in ‘no one is willing to complain that the machine is breaking’. Or it could be taken as it is in the phrase, the “Master Brains had perished”, which describes how complete knowledge amongst humans regarding the mechanical knowledge about the Machine — and possibly its usefulness — had been split up, so that now no one can really remember how the machine is supposed to work. In comparison to the use of the internet, there are still people who do not know what the internet is, let alone know how it can be used or misused. I suspect that most people who use the internet, do not really understand how it works, why it exists, or care much to learn.

The first sentence gives a clue to that the tone of the story is about obedience and regulation, when it describes the setting as being similar to the “cell of a bee”. The discussions about ideas, seem like the collective thought for the humans in this story is that unless something leads to progress or to a new idea, it is a useless waste of time. For instance, when other people in the story discuss the rumor of the machine ending, they cannot even comprehend the statement. As much as I can hardly comprehend living without civil rights or an electrified home, I suppose that soon there will be people who cannot comprehend a time before the internet or computers.

Lastly, the people in this story seem afraid to think on their own and come up with their own ideas, particularly when those ideas are not acceptable to those allowed by the Machine. The internet now makes it very easy to find ideas like your own. So that if you want to find arguments that agree or disagree with your own, it’s easy to find examples, without really coming up with your own critical analysis of a problem.

Comm Lab: Week 2 — My (short) Tree Museum visit

This week, one of my assignments was to head to the Bronx to check out the Tree Museum, a public art project by Katie Holten. By name only, this sounds like it actually might be kind of interesting. I visited the Bronx Botanical Gardens last summer (2008) and I was thoroughly impressed. Everyone should go check it out. However, when I checked out the website, my hopefulness began to wane. Seriously. Rather than go into a terribly long discussion about what I didn’t like, I’ll just mention the two areas that disappointed me the most and will probably keep me from checking out more of this tree tour.

Disappointment #1: The first thing I was disappointed with was The Bronx. Well, I’m sort of scared of the Bronx. I mean, say what you will about gentrification, but what you don’t say is unsafe. I guess I prefer prefer strollers and soccer moms to whatever it is that goes on in the Bronx that keeps most people from visiting every weekend. So, I was a bit hesitant about checking it out. Also, the tour seemed to be about 70 blocks long and it just seemed like a bad idea for someone to go wandering around an unfamiliar neighborhood with no particular destination in mind, except to walk the length of the Bronx and look at semi-random trees that most people in the surrounding neighborhoods didn’t really seem to take too much notice of. So, to be safe, I wanted to look up as much as possible as I could on the website before visiting, including calling the 718 (not toll-free) number and see what this thing was all about. Which leads me to…

Disappointment #2. Not only was the audio quality poor enough that I could barely comprehend the speaker’s voice while sitting in a semi-empty room on a Sunday afternoon, but they also let the artist herself speak. What you learn on the site is that Ms. Holten is Irish. I love accents, but “poor audio” + “funny accent” = “I don’t know what you’re talking about”.

I don’t want to sound like I’m picking on the Irish accent, but the audio quality was very poorly implemented. It seems as if they forgot that New York City is L-O-U-D. When I visited on Wednesday morning, I didn’t call the 718 number but it wouldn’t have mattered anyway. I got off the subway at the 135th St. stop in the Bronx. Right under a bridge. If I could barely hear inside a building, how would I possibly be able to hear anywhere in NYC outside and especially near a bridge? The street where the tour takes place is called “Grand Concourse”. It sounds like a major street, and I would expect that it’s probably always loud.

I don’t know if this walking museum idea was actually tested out before going through with the project, but my guess is no. I know that Fort Tryon Park is pretty darn quiet for anywhere in Manhattan. Seems like it would be a much better destination for outdoor listening of relatively good audio. And, there are definitely plenty of kids and strollers.