Solving Design Problems like a Mathematician

While reading a forum discussion on FreeCodeCamp, I came across a reference to George P贸lya’s book, “How to Solve a Problem”. In this post, I review P贸lya’s problem solving strategy.

In a recent FreeCodeCamp forum, someone asked a question about journaling:

Hi coders,
While looking for the source for my project, I saw that some programmers or developers wrote a kind of diary to keep track of the code. I think it鈥檚 nice, but I was wondering exactly how you can structure a diary and if any of you use this to write code.聽Question here.

Good question. I’ve seen other people use diaries or online journals, or those things people use…writing logs or whatever. 馃檪

Anyway, the only reply includes a link about using a “logbook”. On the link page, the author references George P贸lya聽and his book聽How to Solve It. I had never heard of this person or his book, so I did a little research.

George P贸lya, (1887 – 1985)

George P贸lya was a Hungarian-born mathematician who was known for his mathematics work, as well as his work in heuristics. Heuristics is “any approach to problem solving or self-discovery that employs a practical method”.

“Examples that employ heuristics include using a聽rule of thumb, an聽educated guess, an聽intuitive聽judgment, a聽guesstimate,聽profiling, or聽common sense.”

He聽wrote a book about solving problems using common sense principles.

1st edition cover of “How to Solve It”, published in 1945, by George P贸lya, a Hungarian mathematician.

The George P贸lya Method of Solving Problems

The Wikipedia page聽shows that聽P贸lya聽lays out some pretty good heuristics for solving problems. Although he intended for these strategies to be used for solving math problems, I think they could be used to provide a structured method for solving almost any difficult problem.

The P贸lya problem solving method involves 4 principles:

  1. First, you have to聽understand聽the聽problem.
  2. After understanding,聽make a plan.
  3. Carry out the plan.
  4. Look back聽on your work.How could it be better?

So how does it work?

Principle 1: Understand the Problem

P贸lya based the first principle, Understand the Problem, on the idea that math students struggled to solve problems due to a聽lack of understanding聽the problem in full or in part. His technique involved coaching teachers to prompt students with the following questions:

  • What are you asked to find or show?
  • Can you restate the problem in your own words?
  • Can you think of a picture or a diagram that might help you understand the problem?
  • Is there enough information to enable you to find a solution?
  • Do you understand all the words used in stating the problem?
  • Do you need to ask a question to get the answer?

Essentially one should not move past principle one until a constructive answer can be given. It’s not clear from the Wikipedia entry if a constructive answer is required for聽each question or the entire problem.

聽Principle 2: Make a Plan

Basically he felt that a person gets better at selecting a good plan/strategy the more times they solve problems. Here’s a big list of strategies:

  • Guess and check
  • Make an orderly list
  • Eliminate possibilities
  • Use symmetry
  • Consider special cases
  • Use direct reasoning
  • Solve an equation
  • Look for a pattern
  • Draw a picture
  • Solve a simpler problem
  • Use a model
  • Work backward
  • Use a formula
  • Be creative – (“[Have] patience to wait until the bright idea appears”)
  • Applying these rules to devise a plan takes your own skill and judgement – (“Always use your own brain first”)

Principle 3: Carry out the plan

Simple enough, but the main problem people have with this step is giving up too soon. For that, the Wikipedia entry says:

“In general, all you need is care and patience, given that you have the necessary skills. Persist with the plan that you have chosen. If it continues not to work, discard it and choose another.”

Principle 4: Review, Reflect and Extrapolate

Take a look at what you’ve done, and evaluate how well it worked (or didn’t), and see how you can use what you’ve discovered for future problems.

Finding the book:

If you want to find this book, I recommend trying your library. I found it by searching for "how to solve it book pdf" (Google suggested the "pdf") and I found a copy.


An earlier version of this post included an account of how I applied Polya’s technique to my portfolio changes. A follow-up聽post will focus on that account.

UX Design Fundamentals:

UX Apprentice is a static website that takes site visitors through a 3-step UX project to teach visitors about the process of UX. The steps the site goes through are聽Discovery, Strategy, Design.

As it states on the first page, each step describes what the step is all about, it provides examples, there’s a very short knowledge quiz, and a list of resources consisting of books, articles/sites, and a

As it states on the first page, each step describes what the step is all about, it provides examples, there’s a very short knowledge quiz, and a list of resources consisting of books, articles/sites, and a who’s who list of names.


  • Great connection between the description of the information, using the outlines and icons from the top of each page to the bottom.
  • Good use of navigation to prompt site visitors to go from one explanation to another.


  • The聽website provides a lot of information, but it’s highly biased to be accessible for people聽who already know a bit about UX. There just isn’t enough information to help someone who is totally new to UX get started.
  • Many of the articles are a few years old, and a few links for the books and articles are broken. For instance, I tried to take a look at the Kevin Cheng book on the Discovery page, and an article on the strategy page called “What is User Experience Strategy, Anyway?” Both links were dead. See update.
  • It’s an advertisement for Balsamiq. While I like the information this site provides, in the end the entire site is essentially an advertisement for the wireframing tool Balsamiq. It doesn’t hit you over the head with it, but it’s the truth.

Final Thoughts

I’d still recommend the site to someone as a possible resource, along with other resources, but I’d preface it by saying that there might be a lot of broken links in the reference sections.


As you can read in the comments, Jessica from Balsamiq contacted me to let me know that they updated their links. I’ve checked it out and this appears to be the case.

Some of the people they’re linking to may have broken links, but that can’t be helped.

Checking out their resources, I found a 4-video series聽of Lean UX Strategy YouTube聽which I recommend because it won’t take more than 15 minutes to watch.